India and Kashmir: The Constitutional Journey of Article 370
<div><img width="1200" height="900" src="https://www.financebrokerage.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/pexels-imad-clicks-6738359.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" /></div><div><div><div><div>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery-cookie/1.4.1/jquery.cookie.min.js"></script>
<script>
jQuery(document).ready(function ($) {
var cookie_token = $.cookie('token');
url = window.location.href;
var param = url.split('?')[1]
console.log(url);
if ($.cookie('token') && param != 'webview=true') {
var settings = {
"url": "https://my.financebrokerage.com/api/transactions/my",
"method": "GET",
"timeout": 0,
"headers": {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": `Bearer ${cookie_token}`
},
};
$.ajax(settings).done(function (response) {
if (response[0].status == "Approved") {
$('.blur').html(`British rule and the Instrument of Accession signed by the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir, Hari Singh, in 1947. This agreement allowed Jammu and Kashmir to accede to India while preserving its internal autonomy. The inclusion of Article 370 in the Indian Constitution in 1950 further solidified this special status.</p>
<p>Article 370 holds immense significance in India’s constitutional history. The article has been a subject of intense debate and controversy since its inception. Understanding its historical context is crucial to comprehend its implications on the relationship between India and Jammu and Kashmir.<br />
Article 370 granted a significant degree of autonomy to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. It grants the state its own constitution, separate from the Indian Constitution, and allows it to have its own flag and administrative powers. Under this provision, the jurisdiction of the Indian Parliament is limited to matters of defense, foreign affairs, and communication.</p>
<p>The rationale behind Article 370 was to provide a temporary arrangement for the integration of Jammu and Kashmir into India, allowing the state to gradually assimilate into the Indian Union. It was intended to maintain the unique identity and aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 was initially intended to be temporary, with the idea that a more permanent solution for Jammu and Kashmir’s integration would be devised in due course. However, due to various political and regional complexities, the provision has remained in place for 70-plus years, continuing to shape the often-fractious relationship between India and Jammu and Kashmir.</p>
<p>As said, Article 370 has played a crucial role in defining the relationship between India and Jammu and Kashmir. This autonomy was seen as a means to protect the cultural and political identity of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.<br />
However, the special status granted by Article 370 also created a sense of separatism and alienation among certain sections of the population. Some argued that the provision hindered the complete integration of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Union and impeded the development and progress of the state.</p>
<p>Its critics argue that it created a separate set of laws and privileges for the people of Jammu and Kashmir, leading to a sense of discrimination among other Indian citizens. They believe that the provision hindered the development and progress of the state and created a sense of separatism.</p>
<p>In 2019 Tens of thousands of Indian troops were positioned in the region, a major Hindu pilgrimage was canceled, schools were closed, tourists were instructed to leave, telephone and internet services were shut down, a strict curfew was imposed, and many Kashmiri politicians were arrested. This was followed by a government announcement saying it was overturning nearly all of Article 370.</p>
<p>The Indian government’s abrogation of Article 370, was accompanied by the reorganization of the state into two separate union territories, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. further fuelling the controversy. The move was met with both praise and criticism. Supporters of the abrogation argued that it was necessary for the complete integration of Jammu and Kashmir into the Indian Union and would pave the way for development and progress in the region. Critics, on the other hand, viewed it as a violation of the special status granted to the state and a threat to its cultural and political identity.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019 and now the Supreme Court’s unanimous verdict has marked a significant milestone in the constitutional journey of India. It has sparked a continued debate on the implications of the provision and its revocation. The future implications of this move are yet to be fully realized, and it remains to be seen how the relationship between India and Jammu and Kashmir will evolve in the coming years.</p>
<p>Regardless of one’s stance on Article 370, it is undeniable that it has played a crucial role in shaping the relationship between India and Jammu and Kashmir. Its historical context, provisions, controversies, and abrogation have all contributed to its significance in India’s constitutional history. As the debate continues, it must be hoped the aspirations and concerns of the people of Jammu and Kashmir are respected and their unique identity is safeguarded.`);
} else {
$('.blur').css({
'background': 'linear-gradient(95deg, #4e4e4e 25%, #000 45%, #bbb 75%, #FFFFFF 100%) 98%/200% 100%',
'text-transform': 'inherit',
'-webkit-background-clip': 'text',
'background-clip': 'text',
'-webkit-text-fill-color': 'transparent'
})
$(".wpb_content_element").append(`<div>
<h5> Want to read more?</h5>
<p>Click on the button below to access all premium content <br> articles by purchasing one of our educational packages</p>
<a href="https://www.financebrokerage.com/premium-education-2/">GET PREMIUM</a>
</div > `)
}
});
} else {
$('.blur').css({
'background': 'linear-gradient(95deg, #4e4e4e 25%, #000 45%, #bbb 75%, #FFFFFF 100%) 98%/200% 100%',
'text-transform': 'inherit',
'-webkit-background-clip': 'text',
'background-clip': 'text',
'-webkit-text-fill-color': 'transparent'
})
$(".wpb_content_element").append(`<div>
<h5> Want to read more?</h5>
<p>Click on the button below to access all premium content <br> articles by purchasing one of our educational packages</p>
<a href="https://www.financebrokerage.com/premium-education-2/?webview=true">GET PREMIUM</a>
</div > `)
}
});
</script>
<div>
<div>
<h2>India and Kashmir: The Constitutional Journey of Article 370:</h2>
<p>On December 11th India’s Supreme Court delivered a unanimous verdict, to uphold the government’s 2019 decision to revoke Article 370 of India’s constitution. In so doing, it overturned the semi-autonomous status of Jammu & Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority state. Although greatly opposed by many, particularly Kashmiris, it was a priority of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) which took power in 2019 and had always opposed the Article. Arguing the move to abrogate the Article was aimed at bringing Jammu and Kashmir on par with other states of India and promote the development and progress of the region.</p>
<p>The roots of Article 370 can be <span>traced back to the end of </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div></div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.financebrokerage.com/india-and-kashmir-the-constitutional-journey-of-article-370/">India and Kashmir: The Constitutional Journey of Article 370</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.financebrokerage.com">FinanceBrokerage</a>.</p>
Leave a Comment